
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
Doctors seek to understand why quitting antidepressants causes withdrawal for some - 2
Green Inflections: A Manual for Inside Plants - 3
Kissing is an ‘evolutionary conundrum.’ Scientists just mapped its unexpected origins - 4
No red, no long shorts: The fashion rules Joe Burrows lives by - 5
Dominating Capable Mastercard Utilization: Key Contemplations
CDC vaccine panel votes to remove universal hepatitis B birth dose recommendation
New findings suggest atmosphere could exist on exoplanet TOI-561b
Early Thanksgiving week forecast: Where Americans can expect cold, rain and snow for the holiday
Was This Driver Simply Having A great time Or Behaving Like An Ass?
'Wow!' The eye surgery marathon that restored sight for some South Africans
'I carried my wife's body for an hour and a half' - BBC hears stories of protesters killed in Iran
'Seditious behavior': Trump accuses Democrats who made video reminding the military not to follow illegal orders of a crime — but is it?
Global measles cases drop 71% in 24 years as vaccination coverage improves, WHO says
New ‘Cloud-9’ object could reveal the secrets of dark matter













